George Washington May Have Been The Father Of Our Country, But His Fri
This essay George Washington May Have Been The Father Of Our Country, But His Fri has a total of 712 words and 3 pages.
George Washington may have been the Father of Our Country, but his friend John Marshall defined for the new nation what it meant to be united and to live under the rule of law.
Confirmed as the fourth chief justice of the Supreme Court in 1801, Marshall inherited a bench which had yet to make its voice clear. It was considered by many to be a paper tiger, unable to enforce what rulings it issued, and unclear as to its role in the new government. Throughout his 34-year term as the nation's highest magistrate, Marshall not only gave the court this voice, but positioned the judicial branch as a non-partisan member in the tripartite of American checks and balances. In so doing, he did more than just establish the institution, the writer and legal scholar Anthony Lewis tells LIFE, but he established the national government. If America was to be ruled by law and not by monarchs, the military, or the whim of states, then the constitution, argued Marshall, must be the supreme law.
The Marshall court's first major decision came amidst partisan bickering between Thomas Jefferson's Republicans and John Adams's Federalists. In the case of Marbury v. Madison--the Court was being asked, essentially, to sanction the Judiciary Act of 1789, an act of Congress--Marshall drew a line in the sand. It is a proposition too plain to be contested, read Marshall from his court's unanimous opinion, that the constitution controls any legislative act repugnant to it. No matter that the representatives sitting in Congress spoke for their states when the Judiciary Act was passed. To allow any legislation to wield more power than justice itself, reduces to nothing what we have deemed the greatest improvement on political institutions, said Marshall, --a written constitution. Marshall's decision did have its detractors at the time, but the court had spoken with one, clear voice. The Supreme Court's power of judicial review, first used in Marbury, is today assumed. John Marshall's decision in Marbury v. Madison was one of civilization's finest hours, writes biographer Leonard Baker, one of mankind's greatest acIf it was clear, after that decision, what influence the Supreme Court could bring to the newly set table of checks and balances, the national government was still viewed by many as beholden to the will of the states. The argument went that the states, which had ratified the constitution, should hold power over the government they had certified. Marshall, who had served his country in the snows of Valley Forge during the brutal winter of 1777-78, believed that the constitution represented the people, not the states, in their more perfect Union. In McCulloch v. Maryland the Marshall court unanimously declared that the Union is, emphatically and truly, a government of the people. In form and substance it emanates from them, and for their benefit. As to the power held by the national government? Let the end be legitimate, said Marshall, let it be within the scope of the constitution, and all means which are appropriate, which are plainly adapted to that end, which are not prohibited, but consist with the letter and spirit of the constitution, are constitutional.
Marshall then, in just two decisions, had solidified not only the Supreme Court but the nation as well. His career would be noted also for decisions that recognized the sanctity of contracts and private corporations, enabling the American economy to grow into the powerhouse that it is today. It is hard to imagine what course the nation would have followed without the mind of Marshall at the helm. For it was his mind, his power of reason and understanding of the new form of government which his peers had created, that still stands the test of time by the adherence to precedents he set. His biographer, Jean Edward Smith, fully aware of the Founding Fathers he alluded to, states that Marshall possessed the best-organized mind of his generation. Thomas Jefferson too, though often at odds with Marshall, conceded that you must never give him an affirmative answer or you will be forced to grant his conclusion. Why, if he were to ask me if it were daylight or not, I'd reply, 'Sir, I don't know, I can't tell.'
Topics Related to George Washington May Have Been The Father Of Our Country, But His Fri
Marshall Court, 6th United States Congress, Marbury v. Madison, Presidency of Thomas Jefferson, John Marshall, Supreme Court of the United States, Judicial review, United States Constitution, Supreme court, Separation of powers, Judicial review in the United States, Stuart v. Laird
Essays Related to George Washington May Have Been The Father Of Our Country, But His Fri
In 1800, President John Adams lost his bid for re-In 1800, President John Adams lost his bid for re-election. Thomas Jefferson was voted in for the president. Adams, being a Federalist, disagreed with the beliefs of Jefferson, a republican, and feared that he would shift the power in the government to the states. To prevent this, Adams created many new judicial posts and filled them with Federalists. He did this in quite a rush, being he was going to be out of office soon. All the appointments were given to his Secretary of State to be sealed a
Introduction The Allied invasion of France on JuneIntroduction The Allied invasion of France on June 6, 1944 is variously known as D-Day, the Longest Day, Cross-Channel Attack, and probably some others as well. It was the largest single military operation of World War II. Hence, the Normandy beaches are a must stop if you get anywhere close to France. The 50th anniversary celebration in 1994 generated a lot of hype. The recent movie Saving Private Ryan rekindled that interest. However, the landing always held a special niche going back to the e
George Washington may have been the Father of OurGeorge Washington may have been the Father of Our Country, but his friend John Marshall defined for the new nation what it meant to be united and to live under the rule of law. Confirmed as the fourth chief justice of the Supreme Court in 1801, Marshall inherited a bench which had yet to make its voice clear. It was considered by many to be a paper tiger, unable to enforce what rulings it issued, and unclear as to its role in the new government. Throughout his 34-year term as the nation\'s highe
February 24, 2000February 24, 2000 Michael J. Petrides 623 My Journal of Thurgood Marshall Day 1, Today I was born, I was the second son of William Marshall, my dad. I was born on July 2, 1908, in West Baltimore, Maryland. My father worked as a dining car waiter for the Baltimore and Ohio Railroad. This job was descent for African Americans at that time. My aunt once remarked that when I was a child I was very cute and I had big dark eyes. Day 2, On September 4, 1929 I married a women named Vivian Burey, althoug
Lord of the FliesLord of the Flies Why do we choose the leaders that we do?: In the following paper, I\'m going to attempt to explain why it is that we choose the leaders in which we do. There are many various reasons why we pick certain individuals to lead us. The first one, which is in no relation to Loard of the Flies, is by being appointed. People are often predetermined leaders. One of the most obvious examples of this is royalty. For thousands of years, sons and daughters of royal famlies are given power w
Marshall E. BeggsMarshall E. Beggs 1999-02-05 Hemingway’s Hero Of the segments of American society scarred by the anguish of the First World War, the damage was most severe amongst the younger generation of that time. Youthful and impressionable, these people were immersed headlong into the furious medley of death and devastation. By the time the war had ended, many found that they could no longer accept what now seemed to be pretentious and contradictory moral standards of nations that could be capable of such
Julius and Ethel RosenbergJulius and Ethel Rosenberg The outcome of the Julius and Ethel Rosenberg trial for espionage in 1951 and their subsequent execution in 1953 was directly related to the political climate at that time. The government’s evidence against the Rosenbergs was not overwhelming, but due to a combination of fear and political pressure, the guilty verdict was inevitable. Even though Julius did not deliver the secrets of the atomic bomb to Moscow, nor did they cause the Korean War, as Judge Kaufman claimed,
Franklin D. Roosevelt was born in Hyde Park, New YFranklin D. Roosevelt was born in Hyde Park, New York on January 30, 1882. He was the son of James Roosevelt and Sara Delano Roosevelt. His parents and private tutors provided him with almost all his education. At a young age, he became interested in birds. For his eleventh birthday, he asked his parents for a gun to began a collection of all the birds that were native to Dutchess County. By the time he entered college, he had collected and identified about 300 different kinds of birds. Today, h
Thomas JeffersonThomas Jefferson Sadly, modern Americans seem to have done a better job preserving what Thomas Jefferson has left us in bricks and mortar than we have preserving his ideas. Tourists visiting Charlottesville, Virginia, can witness firsthand the ongoing efforts to preserve Jefferson\'s home at Monticello as well as his splendid little Academical Village, the Lawn, which is still a vital center of student life at the University of Virginia. Further down the road, near Lynchburg, Virginia, preservat
The Manhattan ProjectThe Manhattan Project In the months following the bombing of Pearl Harbor the Manhattan Project--the name given to the atomic bomb program because its original offices were in Manhattan--grew very quickly. And although the Army had been involved since June of 1942, it was just beginning to realize that someone was going to have to be put in overall charge. The man chosen was Leslie Richard Groves, a 46-year-old colonel in the Army Corps of Engineers. While he was a competent engineer, Groves was
During the last century a great deal of legislatioDuring the last century a great deal of legislation was passed to protect womenOn the on-going fight for improvement of women as employees. Improvements involved the effect of restricting their hours of work, their opportunities to engage night work, and the types of work they were legally permitted to undertake. The purpose of such provision was to provide opportunities for women, and to decrease the level of discrimination. Discrimination can occur in a number of ways e.g. in the essence of
The pressures of white expansionism led the UnitedThe pressures of white expansionism led the United States Government to find ways to remove the Native Americans from their fertile lands. Spurred by this pressure, and the need to fulfill his campaign promise to open Indian land for settlement, Andrew Jackson pushed through Congress the Removal Act. The Act allowed the government to negotiate treaties with the various Native American tribes, pay them for their lands, relocate them to western lands, and support the tribes for one year after remo
African American CommunityAfrican American Community By 1945, nearly everyone in the African American community had heard gospel music (2). At this time, gospel music was a sacred folk music with origins in field hollers, work songs, slave songs, Baptist lining hymns, and Negro spirituals. These songs that influenced gospel music were adapted and reworked into expressions of praise and thanks of the community. Although the harmonies were similar to those of the blues or hymns in that they shared the same simplicity, the
Affirmative action works. There are thousands of eAffirmative action works. There are thousands of examples of situations where people of color, white women, and working class women and men of all races who were previously excluded from jobs or educational opportunities, or were denied opportunities once admitted, have gained access through affirmative action. When these policies received executive branch and judicial support, vast numbers of people of color, white women and men have gained access they would not otherwise have had. These gains
It Is Time to Reaffirm Our ActionsIt Is Time to Reaffirm Our Actions On Equal Opportunity The history of this Nation is being carved with the chisels of our incessant struggle towards freedom and equality. Evidently, that struggle has continually propelled us scores of years away from slavery and flagrant bigotry. Yes, we can not deny to ourselves that our odyssey to the realms of crystal-clear equality has not yet ended. Though, attempting to surpass the craters of injustice with fabricated bridges of unequal treatment will mer
In the late seventies, Our Nation became shocked aIn the late seventies, Our Nation became shocked and outraged by the rape , multilation, and murder of a dozen young beautiful girls.The man who was mainly responsable for these murders, Ted Bundy, who was later apprehended and executed.During his detention in various penitentiaries,he was mentally probed and probbed by phycologist and phychoanalysts hoping to discover the root of violent actions and sexual frustrations.Many theories arose in attempts to explain the motivational factors behind h
Identity CrisisIdentity Crisis The American people have a serious identity crisis. It’s rare while in the country to hear someone say that they are American. People say that they are Irish, Scottish, German, Italian, African, English, West Indian, etc. Often people are a combination of these. For black Americans it becomes even more complicated. Many want to identify as African but others would never dream of such a thing because it’s so foreign to them. I was speaking to a man at a party I had at my apartment